CCPP Module 17, Section 3: Benchmarking and Dashboard Design
MODULE 17: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT

Section 17.3: Benchmarking and Dashboard Design

An advanced lesson in data visualization. We’ll cover the principles of effective dashboard design and the importance of benchmarking your performance against national standards and internal goals to provide context and drive motivation.

SECTION 17.3

From Data to Decisions: The Art of Actionable Insight

Transforming spreadsheets and numbers into a compelling visual story of your clinical value.

17.3.1 The “Why”: Data is Not Information, Information is Not Insight

In the previous sections, you learned how to select the right metrics and use a systematic process to improve them. You have started collecting data: a list of your patients’ HbA1c values, the number of interventions you’ve made, the reduction in 30-day readmissions. You may have a spreadsheet filled with rows and columns of powerful, important numbers. This is a monumental achievement, but it is only the first step. Raw data, in and of itself, is useless to most decision-makers. A spreadsheet with 500 rows of lab values does not tell a story; it creates a headache.

To be effective, your data must undergo a critical transformation. Data, put into context, becomes Information. For example, the raw number “8.2%” is data. The statement, “Patient Smith’s HbA1c is 8.2%, which is above the goal of <8.0%," is information. But even information is not enough to drive action at a system level. Information, when visualized and compared against a standard, becomes Insight. Insight is the “aha!” moment. It’s the point where a complex reality becomes clear, and the path forward becomes obvious. A well-designed chart showing that 70% of your patients are above their A1c goal, compared to only 40% in a benchmark group, is an insight that screams for action.

This is the critical “why” behind this section. The practice of dashboard design and benchmarking is the art and science of transforming raw data into actionable insight. A dashboard is not just a collection of charts; it is a communication tool, a strategic weapon, and a story-telling device. It is how you take the incredible clinical value you create every day and make it visible, understandable, and undeniable to the executives, managers, and payers who control the resources your program needs to survive and grow. Neglecting this final step is like performing a brilliant clinical study and then hiding the manuscript in a drawer. The value is there, but if no one can see it or understand it, it effectively doesn’t exist for the organization.

Pharmacist Analogy: The Comprehensive Patient Profile Review

Think about your ingrained, instinctual process for reviewing a complex patient’s profile before they see the doctor. That profile is, in essence, a patient-level dashboard. You don’t just look at one piece of data in isolation. You synthesize multiple data points to gain a holistic insight into the patient’s status.

  • You see a list of medications. That’s data.
  • You see the patient is on lisinopril 10mg, amlodipine 5mg, and HCTZ 12.5mg. You also see their most recent blood pressure is 152/94 mmHg. You’ve just combined data points to create information: “The patient is on three antihypertensives but remains uncontrolled.”
  • You then look at the fill history and see a Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) of only 55% for the lisinopril. You look at the last clinic note and see a serum potassium of 5.4 mEq/L. You look at their problem list and see CKD Stage 3. Now, you have synthesized multiple pieces of information into a powerful insight: “The patient’s hypertension is uncontrolled likely due to poor adherence, and we are limited in up-titrating their ACE inhibitor due to borderline hyperkalemia in the setting of CKD. This patient is a perfect candidate for a switch to a non-RAAS agent like hydralazine or a different class to achieve goal BP.”

A good service-level dashboard does for your entire patient panel what you just did for a single patient. It brings together the key clinical, operational, and financial data points. It visually flags the problems (like a high BP reading). It provides the context (like lab values and adherence data). And it allows you to quickly identify where you need to focus your efforts. You are already an expert at creating dashboards of one; this section will teach you to create dashboards of hundreds.

17.3.2 The Art of the Dashboard: Principles of Effective Data Visualization

Creating an effective dashboard is more than just plugging numbers into Excel and hitting the “chart” button. It is a discipline that blends data science with graphic design and human psychology. A great dashboard communicates complex information with clarity, precision, and efficiency. A poor dashboard confuses, misleads, and frustrates the user, ultimately undermining the value of the data it contains. The following principles are your guide to creating dashboards that inform and inspire action.

Principle 1: Know Thy Audience, Know Thy Goal

This is the cardinal rule. A dashboard is a communication tool, and you cannot communicate effectively without knowing who you are talking to and what you want them to know. A single dashboard will rarely serve all stakeholders equally well. You must tailor the content and the level of detail to the specific audience and their primary concerns.

Masterclass Table: Tailoring Dashboards to Stakeholder Needs
Audience Primary Question Key Metrics of Interest Ideal Dashboard Characteristics
C-Suite Executive
(CEO, CFO, CNO)
“Is this service providing a positive return on investment and helping the hospital meet its strategic goals?”
  • Financial: ROI, Total Cost Avoidance, Readmission Penalty Reduction.
  • High-Level Clinical: Impact on major pay-for-performance metrics (e.g., HEDIS, Star Ratings).
  • Operational: Total Panel Size, Year-over-Year Growth.
High-level, summary view (“at a glance”). Uses large, clear KPI cards with red/yellow/green indicators. Focuses on trends over time and comparison to financial targets. Low on granular detail.
Clinic/Service Line Manager
(Your direct boss)
“Is the pharmacy service running efficiently, meeting productivity targets, and satisfying the providers who refer to it?”
  • Operational: Encounters per FTE, New Patient Wait Time, No-Show Rate, Referral Sources.
  • Clinical: Key process measures (e.g., GDMT utilization) and primary outcome measures (e.g., BP/A1c control).
  • Financial: May want to see cost avoidance numbers to justify their budget.
A blend of summary and detail. Compares current performance to targets. May include charts showing workload distribution and efficiency trends. Balances all three pillars of measurement.
Clinical Team Member
(Yourself, fellow pharmacists, collaborating providers)
“Which of our patients are not at goal, and what do we need to do today to improve their care?”
  • Clinical: Patient-level data. Lists of patients with A1c > 9%, BP > 160/100, or overdue for follow-up. Recent lab values.
  • Operational: Your personal schedule, list of incoming referrals to be triaged.
  • Financial: Generally not relevant for this view.
Highly detailed and actionable. Often presented as lists or tables that can be sorted and filtered. The goal is not just to report, but to generate a daily “to-do” list. This is often called an “operational” or “clinical” dashboard.

Principle 2: Maximize the Data-Ink Ratio

This concept, popularized by data visualization pioneer Edward Tufte, is simple but powerful. “Data-ink” is the portion of the ink on a page (or pixels on a screen) that is used to represent the actual data. The goal is to maximize this ratio by removing any ink that is non-essential, redundant, or purely decorative. This decorative, non-data ink is called “chartjunk.”

Declare War on Chartjunk

Your default spreadsheet program is your worst enemy in this fight. It is designed to create visually loud, often misleading charts. Your mission is to systematically remove the junk.
Common forms of chartjunk to eliminate:

  • 3D Effects: Never use 3D bars, pies, or lines. They distort the data and make it impossible to read accurately.
  • Heavy Gridlines: Mute them to a light gray or remove them entirely if they aren’t necessary for reading the data.
  • Redundant Labels: If you have the value at the top of a bar, you don’t also need a y-axis with the same information.
  • Loud Colors / Backgrounds: Use color strategically to highlight key data, not for decoration. Use a neutral background.
  • Unnecessary Borders and Shading: Keep it clean and simple. Let the data speak for itself.

Principle 3: Choose the Right Chart for the Job

Using the wrong type of chart is like choosing the wrong drug for a disease—at best, it’s ineffective; at worst, it’s harmful and misleading. Your choice of visualization must match the type of data you have and the story you want to tell.

Masterclass Table: A Pharmacist’s Formulary of Charts
Use Case (What you want to show) Recommended Chart Pharmacist Example Key Considerations
Comparing values between categories. Bar Chart (Vertical or Horizontal) Comparing the BP control rate across different clinics or providers. Each clinic is a bar. The workhorse of data visualization. Always start the axis at zero. Use a horizontal bar chart if you have long category labels.
Showing a trend over time. Line Chart Tracking your clinic’s average HbA1c month-over-month for the past year. Excellent for showing changes, acceleration, or deceleration. The time axis should always be the horizontal (x) axis.
Showing parts of a whole. Pie Chart or Donut Chart Breakdown of referral sources (e.g., 40% Endocrinology, 30% Primary Care, 30% Cardiology). Use with extreme caution! Humans are bad at comparing angles. Never use it for more than 3-4 categories. A bar chart is often better and easier to read. Never, ever use a 3D pie chart.
Showing the relationship between two variables. Scatter Plot Plotting patient adherence (PDC) on the x-axis against their BP reduction on the y-axis to see if there is a correlation. Powerful for identifying relationships and outliers. Requires two sets of continuous data for each data point (e.g., each patient).
Showing the distribution of a single variable. Histogram Showing the distribution of HbA1c values across your entire patient panel to see how many are at goal, near goal, or dangerously high. Looks like a bar chart, but it groups a continuous measure into “bins” of a certain size. Helps you understand the spread and skew of your data.
Showing a single KPI with a target. KPI Card / Gauge A large number showing “72%” for BP control, with a smaller number underneath saying “Goal: 75%” and a red down-arrow indicator. Excellent for the top of a dashboard. Provides an immediate, at-a-glance summary of the most important metrics.

17.3.3 The Science of Context: A Deep Dive into Benchmarking

You have a beautiful, clean chart that shows your clinic’s hypertension control rate is 72%. This is information. But is it good? Or bad? Or average? Without context, the number is meaningless. Benchmarking is the process of comparing your performance data to a relevant reference point to provide that context. It is the single most important technique for turning information into insight and for driving motivation. Knowing you are at 72% is one thing; knowing the national 90th percentile is 78% provides a powerful, aspirational goal.

Masterclass Table: Types of Benchmarks
Benchmark Type Definition Advantages Disadvantages & Caveats
Internal / Historical Comparing your current performance to your own performance in a previous time period (e.g., this quarter vs. last quarter).
  • Easy and free to access the data.
  • Perfectly apples-to-apples comparison.
  • Excellent for demonstrating improvement over time, which is highly motivating for your team.
Doesn’t tell you how you stack up against others. You could be improving from “terrible” to “poor” and not know it.
External / Competitive Comparing your performance to that of other, similar organizations, or to a national/regional standard.
  • The gold standard for understanding your true performance level.
  • Provides aspirational goals (e.g., “Let’s reach the 90th percentile”).
  • Essential for communicating value to payers and executives who operate in this world.
  • Data can be expensive or difficult to obtain.
  • Definitions may not be identical, leading to an “apples-to-oranges” comparison. You must understand the methodology behind the benchmark.
Goal-Based / Target Comparing your current performance against a pre-defined target set by your team or leadership.
  • Directly ties performance measurement to your strategic plan (like your Balanced Scorecard).
  • Clear and easy for the team to understand what “success” looks like.
The target can be arbitrary if not informed by external benchmarks. Setting a goal of 95% BP control may be unrealistic and demoralizing if the top performers nationally are only at 80%.
Clinical Pearl: Use Layered Benchmarks for a Complete Story

The most powerful dashboards use multiple benchmarks on the same chart. For example, a line chart showing your monthly BP control rate (your internal benchmark) could also have a solid horizontal line representing your internal goal (goal-based benchmark) and a dashed horizontal line representing the national HEDIS 90th percentile (external benchmark). This allows a user to see, in a single glance, how you are trending, how you are performing against your own goal, and how you stack up against the best in the country.

17.3.4 Finding Your Yardstick: Sources for High-Quality Benchmarks

Knowing you need external benchmarks is one thing; finding them is another. As a pharmacist, you need to know where to look for credible, relevant, and respected sources of performance data. This is your toolkit for adding powerful context to your dashboards.

Core National Quality Programs
  • HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set): Maintained by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), HEDIS is a set of standardized performance measures used by more than 90% of America’s health plans. Its benchmarks are the industry gold standard.
    • Pharmacy Relevance: Extremely high. Key measures include: Statin Therapy for Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, Statin Use in Persons with Diabetes (SUPD), Medication Adherence for Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cholesterol, Controlling High Blood Pressure.
    • How to Access: NCQA publishes annual “Quality Compass” data with national and regional benchmarks, often broken down by percentile (e.g., 50th, 75th, 90th). This data is often purchased by health systems, so your organization’s Quality department may already have it.
  • Medicare Star Ratings (CMS): The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a 5-star rating system to measure the quality of Medicare Advantage plans. Performance directly impacts plan reimbursement, making these metrics a top priority for health systems.
    • Pharmacy Relevance: Critical. Several measures are directly tied to medication use, particularly the three adherence measures for diabetes medications, statins (RAS antagonists), and statins.
    • How to Access: CMS makes this data publicly available. You can find the annual measure cut-points for each star rating online. For example, you can find the exact PDC score needed to achieve a 5-star rating for statin adherence.
  • PQA (Pharmacy Quality Alliance): A non-profit organization that develops and maintains pharmacy-specific quality measures. Many of the measures used in the Medicare Star Ratings program were developed by PQA.
    • Pharmacy Relevance: This is your home base. They develop measures for adherence, appropriate medication use (e.g., use of high-risk medications in the elderly), and medication safety.
    • How to Access: PQA’s website lists all their endorsed measures. While they don’t publish national benchmark data themselves, they are the source of the definitions that CMS and health plans use.
Other Valuable Sources
  • Your Own Institution: Don’t forget to look internally. Your Quality or Population Health department may have performance data for other clinics in your system. This can be a fantastic source for internal benchmarking.
  • Peer-Reviewed Literature: A simple PubMed search for phrases like “pharmacist impact on hypertension control rates” or “30-day readmission reduction heart failure clinic” will often yield studies that report baseline and post-intervention performance data from institutions similar to yours.
  • Professional Organizations (ASHP, ACCP, etc.): These organizations often publish practice guidelines and consensus statements that, while not providing hard data, can help in setting evidence-based targets for your process measures.

17.3.5 Putting It All Together: Designing Your First Clinical Dashboard

It’s time to move from theory to practice. Let’s design a dashboard for a pharmacist-led diabetes management service, applying all the principles we’ve discussed. This will be a manager-level dashboard, aimed at showing the overall health of the service.

Step 1: The Sketch

Before touching a computer, sketch the layout on paper. The most important information goes at the top left. Group related items. Think about the story you want to tell.

Step 2: The Mockup – A Live Example

Below is an HTML/CSS-based mockup of a well-designed dashboard. Notice the use of KPI cards, trend lines with layered benchmarks, and clear, concise charts. It tells a story from a high-level summary down to more specific details.

Pharmacist Diabetes Service Dashboard

Last Updated: October 1, 2025
Active Patient Panel

312

+15 since last quarter

HbA1c Control (<8%)

74%

Target: 70%

Statin Use (SUPD)

82%

HEDIS 90th %ile: 85%

Annualized Cost Avoidance

$112k

From prevented ED visits

HbA1c Control Rate Over Time
100%75%50%25%
JanAprJulOct
HEDIS 90th
Goal

[Line chart graphic showing upward trend]

Referral Sources (YTD)
Endocrinology
65%
Primary Care
25%
Cardiology
10%
Action List: Patients Requiring Outreach (A1c > 9%)
Patient NameLast A1cLast VisitNext Appt
Jones, Robert9.8%05/12/202510/28/2025
Davis, Maria9.3%07/22/2025None Scheduled
Chen, Wei10.1%06/01/202511/05/2025