Section 24.3: Hiring, Training, and Mentoring Pharmacists or Students
A practical guide to talent acquisition and development. We will cover how to write effective job descriptions, conduct clinical interviews, and create robust onboarding and mentorship programs to build a high-performing team.
The Ultimate Force Multiplier: Building Your Team
Moving from a provider of services to a developer of talent.
24.3.1 The “Why”: People as the Engine of Scale
You have designed the perfect service line, secured the funding, and codified your processes into flawless SOPs. You have built a beautiful, powerful, state-of-the-art vehicle for delivering clinical care. But a vehicle, no matter how well-engineered, goes nowhere without an engine. In a clinical enterprise, your people are the engine. Every other aspect of scaling—financial models, quality dashboards, documentation templates—are merely tools to support and amplify the impact of a high-performing team. Ultimately, the quality of your service can never exceed the quality of the pharmacists delivering it.
This marks the final and most critical evolution in your leadership journey. You must now become a master of talent management. Your primary function is no longer to be the best clinician in the room, but to be the person who can find, develop, and retain the best clinicians. This is the ultimate force multiplier. Hiring one pharmacist who is 80% as effective as you does not just add 80% more capacity; it frees you up to build the systems that will allow you to hire ten more, creating an exponential expansion of your impact. Conversely, a single bad hire can drain your time, damage team morale, compromise patient safety, and tarnish the reputation you worked so hard to build.
Therefore, talent management cannot be an afterthought or something you delegate to Human Resources. It must be a core competency and a strategic priority. You must become as rigorous and evidence-based in your approach to hiring as you are to selecting an antibiotic. You must be as systematic in your onboarding as you are in your hypertension protocol. And you must be as dedicated to mentoring your team as you are to counseling your most complex patients. This section provides the masterclass for that discipline. We will deconstruct the entire talent lifecycle, from writing a job description that attracts A-players, to conducting interviews that separate true clinical thinkers from book-smart technicians, to building onboarding and mentorship programs that transform promising hires into the future leaders of your organization.
Pharmacist Analogy: The Head Coach & General Manager
Imagine you were a star player on a championship basketball team. Your success was defined by your on-court performance: your points, your assists, your defense. Now, you have been promoted to Head Coach and General Manager of the team. Your definition of success has radically changed.
You can no longer win the game by yourself. Your job is to build and lead a team that can win. This requires a new set of skills that operate across a full season, not just a single game:
- Scouting & The Draft (Hiring): As the GM, you spend months scouting college players. You’re not just looking at their stats (their CV). You’re watching game film to assess their decision-making under pressure (the clinical interview). You’re interviewing their college coaches to learn about their work ethic and coachability (reference checks). Your goal is to draft players who not only have talent but also fit your team’s culture.
- Training Camp (Onboarding): The new players arrive. As the Head Coach, you don’t just throw them a basketball and say, “Go play.” You run a highly structured training camp. You teach them the team’s playbook (your SOPs). You run them through drills until the core plays are muscle memory (competency assessments). You immerse them in the team’s culture from day one.
- Player Development (Mentorship): Throughout the season, you work with your players. You have team practices (group training) and one-on-one film sessions (mentorship meetings). You help your star point guard develop a better jump shot (a new clinical skill) and you groom your promising rookie to eventually become a team captain (a future leader). Your success is measured by the growth of your players.
A losing coach blames the players. A winning coach accepts that the team’s performance is a direct reflection of their ability to recruit, train, and mentor. As the leader of a growing clinical service, you are the Head Coach and GM. The long-term success of your “franchise” depends not on how well you can play the game, but on how well you can build the team.
24.3.2 Talent Acquisition: The Science of Writing, Sourcing, and Interviewing
Hiring is the single most important decision you will make as a leader, and it must be treated with the rigor of a scientific process, not the whims of gut feeling. A structured, multi-step approach dramatically increases the likelihood of a successful hire and provides a legally defensible framework for your decisions. The process begins long before the first interview, with the foundational document that defines the role and attracts your ideal candidate: the job description.
Step 1: The Job Description as a Marketing and Screening Tool
A job description has two functions. First, it is a marketing document designed to sell the position to high-caliber candidates. Second, it is a screening document that clearly states the required qualifications, helping unqualified candidates to opt-out. A weak job description is filled with generic HR jargon; a powerful one tells a story and sets a high bar.
Masterclass Table: Deconstructing the “Ambulatory Care Clinical Pharmacist” Job Description
| Section | Weak Language (Generic & Uninspiring) | Strong Language (Specific & Compelling) | The Strategic “Why” |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job Summary | The clinical pharmacist will provide pharmaceutical care services to patients. This individual will work as part of the healthcare team. | As a key member of our embedded primary care team, the Ambulatory Care Clinical Pharmacist will manage complex chronic diseases under a collaborative practice agreement. You will be responsible for building your own patient panel, serving as the medication expert for our physicians, and directly impacting patient outcomes in a progressive, team-based model. | The strong version sells the impact and autonomy of the role. It uses keywords like “embedded,” “collaborative practice agreement,” and “medication expert” that attract ambitious, practice-ready candidates. |
| Essential Duties & Responsibilities | – Reviews medication profiles – Counsels patients – Documents interventions – Other duties as assigned |
– Provide comprehensive medication management (CMM) for patients with diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure, including assessment, medication titration, and follow-up. – Serve as the primary provider for our pharmacist-run anticoagulation service. – Conduct Transitional Care Management (TCM) for high-risk patients post-discharge to prevent readmissions. – Actively participate in weekly primary care team huddles and provide curbside consults to medical providers. |
The strong version lists specific, high-level clinical functions. It clearly communicates that this is a provider role, not a dispensing or purely consultative role. The “other duties” line is a red flag for ambiguity. |
| Qualifications (Required) | – BS in Pharmacy or PharmD – State pharmacist license – Good communication skills |
– Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) from an ACPE-accredited school. – Active and unrestricted state pharmacist license. – Completion of a PGY1 Pharmacy Residency (PGY2 in Ambulatory Care preferred). – Board Certification (BCPS, BCACP) or eligibility. |
The strong version sets a high, non-negotiable clinical bar. It explicitly requires residency training and board certification, which screens out candidates without advanced clinical training and signals the high expectations of the role. |
| Qualifications (Preferred/Desired Skills) | – Team player – Works well independently |
– Demonstrable experience managing chronic diseases under a collaborative practice agreement. – Proven ability to build strong professional relationships with physicians and medical staff. – Strong understanding of medical billing (e.g., CPT codes 99605-7, G-codes) for clinical pharmacy services. |
The strong version focuses on specific, tangible skills that predict success in this environment. It asks for proof (“demonstrable,” “proven”), not just personality traits. Including billing knowledge is a key differentiator. |
Step 2: Sourcing and Screening
Once the job is posted, you must move from passive waiting to active sourcing. The best candidates often have jobs and are not actively looking. You must build a pipeline.
- Leverage Your Network: Reach out to residency program directors, colleagues at state and national pharmacy organizations (ASHP, ACCP), and trusted physician partners. A personal referral is the highest quality lead.
- The Phone Screen (15 minutes): Before committing to a full interview, a manager or lead pharmacist should conduct a brief phone screen with promising applicants. The goal is not to assess clinical skill, but to gauge professionalism, communication ability, and confirm their understanding of and genuine interest in the role. This simple step can save dozens of hours by weeding out candidates who are not a serious fit.
Step 3: The Structured Clinical Interview
The interview is the most critical stage of the process. A traditional, unstructured interview (“So, tell me about yourself…”) is a notoriously poor predictor of job performance. A structured, behavioral interview, where every candidate is asked the same set of questions in the same order, is scientifically validated to be more effective and equitable. The goal is to evaluate past behavior as the best predictor of future performance.
The STAR Method: A Framework for Answering Behavioral Questions
You must coach your interview team to listen for and prompt candidates to use the STAR method when answering questions. This structure forces them to provide specific evidence, not just vague opinions.
- S – Situation: Briefly describe the context. “We had a complex patient who was just discharged after a STEMI…”
- T – Task: What was your specific responsibility? “My task was to perform the discharge medication reconciliation and create the plan for his new antiplatelet and statin therapy.”
- A – Action: What specific steps did you take? “First, I…” “Then, I analyzed…” “I called the cardiologist to…”
- R – Result: What was the outcome? “As a result, we identified a critical dose error in the discharge summary, which I corrected. The patient started on the correct guideline-directed therapy, and we successfully billed for the TCM service.”
A candidate who can’t provide a STAR answer is a red flag. They are likely describing a hypothetical situation or exaggerating their role in a team project.
Masterclass: The Clinical Pharmacist Interview Question Bank
| Category | Sample Behavioral Question | What You’re Looking For (A Strong Answer) | Red Flags (A Weak Answer) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Acumen & Judgment | Tell me about the most complex patient you have managed recently. Walk me through your assessment and therapeutic plan. | A structured, logical case presentation. They clearly identify the primary problem, apply current guidelines, and articulate a rational, multi-step plan, including monitoring parameters. They sound like a provider. | They just list the patient’s medications without a clear assessment. Their plan is vague (“I would optimize their meds”). They can’t cite specific guidelines or evidence. They sound like they are reviewing a profile, not managing a patient. |
| Problem-Solving & Critical Thinking | Describe a time you disagreed with a physician’s prescribing decision. How did you handle it, and what was the outcome? | They present their case respectfully and collegially, grounding their argument in evidence, not just opinion. They offer a specific alternative. They focus on patient safety and collaboration, even if the physician didn’t ultimately agree. | “The doctor was wrong, so I told him he had to change it.” (Confrontational). Or: “I just noted it in the chart but didn’t want to make waves.” (Passive/Avoidant). They focus on being “right” rather than on collaborative problem-solving. |
| Communication & Interpersonal Skills | Tell me about a time you had to explain a complex medication regimen to a patient with low health literacy. How did you ensure they understood? | They describe specific techniques: avoiding jargon, using the teach-back method, providing simplified written materials, involving a family member. They demonstrate empathy and a patient-centered approach. | “I just told them to take it as prescribed.” They show little awareness of different communication strategies. They describe what they said, but not how they checked for understanding. |
| Professionalism & Initiative | Describe a time you identified a flaw or inefficiency in a workflow or process. What did you do about it? | They didn’t just complain; they took ownership. They gathered data to define the problem, proposed a specific solution, and worked with others to implement a change, even a small one. They show a “system-thinking” mindset. | “The process was terrible, but that’s just how they did things there.” They show a passive, victim mentality. They are good at spotting problems but take no initiative to solve them. |
Step 4: The Clinical Case Presentation
For your final round of candidates, the most powerful evaluation tool is a standardized clinical case presentation. This moves beyond what they say they can do and shows you their clinical thought process in action. The process is simple: send the finalists a de-identified, moderately complex patient case 48-72 hours before their final interview. Instruct them to prepare a 15-minute presentation outlining their assessment and plan for the patient, followed by a 15-minute Q&A with the hiring panel.
SAMPLE CASE PROMPT
“You are the new ambulatory care pharmacist. A physician refers you ‘Mr. J,’ a 62-year-old male with a history of T2DM, HFrEF (EF 30%), and Stage 3 CKD (eGFR 45). His most recent A1c is 9.2%. His current medications include Metformin 1000mg BID, Glipizide 10mg BID, Lisinopril 40mg daily, and Furosemide 40mg daily. Please prepare a 15-minute presentation on your initial assessment and therapeutic plan for this patient’s diabetes management.”
Case Presentation Evaluation Rubric
| Domain | Excellent (5) | Good (3) | Poor (1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem Identification | Identifies all key issues: uncontrolled DM, inappropriate Glipizide (hypo risk), and identifies the major missed opportunity (no SGLT2i or beta-blocker for HFrEF). | Identifies the uncontrolled diabetes but misses the significance of the medication omissions or safety risks. | Only states “A1c is high.” Fails to see the interplay of the comorbidities. |
| Application of Evidence | Explicitly cites current ADA/ACC guidelines. Recommends an SGLT2i, explaining its triple benefit for DM, HFrEF, and CKD. Recommends starting a beta-blocker for HFrEF. | Recommends a reasonable next step (e.g., adding a DPP-4) but fails to select the optimal agent (SGLT2i) that addresses all comorbidities. | Recommends simply increasing the glipizide dose, which is contraindicated by the guidelines and unsafe. |
| Plan & Monitoring | Provides a specific, actionable plan: “Discontinue Glipizide. Start Empagliflozin 10mg daily. Counsel on sick day rules. Follow up in 4 weeks. Order UACR.” | Plan is vague: “I would add another medication.” Monitoring plan is incomplete. | No clear plan is articulated. |
| Communication | Clear, confident, and professional. Able to defend their choices during Q&A with well-reasoned arguments. | Presentation is organized but lacks confidence or depth during Q&A. | Disorganized, hard to follow, unable to answer questions effectively. |
24.3.3 The First 90 Days: Engineering a World-Class Onboarding Program
You have successfully hired a talented pharmacist. The next 90 days are the most critical period in their employment lifecycle. This is where you have the opportunity to integrate them fully, set them up for success, and validate their decision to join your team. Too many organizations confuse orientation with onboarding. Orientation is a one-day event involving paperwork and a hospital tour. Onboarding is a structured, 90-day process of cultural, clinical, and operational integration. A great onboarding program accelerates a new hire’s journey to full productivity and dramatically increases long-term retention.
Visual Masterclass: The 90-Day Onboarding Roadmap
A successful onboarding program should be mapped out like a clinical pathway, with clear goals and activities at each stage.
Week 1: Connection & Foundation
Goal: Make the new hire feel welcomed and give them the foundational tools for the job.
- Day 1: All IT access (logins, email) is fully functional BEFORE they arrive. Lunch with the team.
- Meet their designated “Onboarding Buddy.”
- Complete HR orientation and benefits enrollment.
- Begin EMR training module 1 (navigation, note-writing).
- Shadow their preceptor for 2 half-day clinics to observe workflow.
Weeks 2-4: Guided Practice & Protocol Immersion
Goal: Deepen clinical knowledge of the service’s specific protocols and begin hands-on, supervised patient care.
- Complete review of the Top 5 most common Clinical SOPs (HTN, DM, Anticoag).
- Begin seeing low-complexity patients with preceptor observing (“We Do” phase).
- Co-sign all documentation with preceptor providing daily feedback.
- Meet key referring physicians and medical assistants.
- Complete initial competency assessment for point-of-care testing.
Month 2: Increasing Independence
Goal: Transition the new hire to managing their own patient panel with indirect supervision.
- Begin seeing patients independently, starting with a reduced schedule (e.g., 50% of a full load).
- Preceptor performs daily chart reviews and holds a 30-minute check-in at the end of each day.
- Present a patient case at the monthly team meeting.
- Complete training on billing procedures and CPT coding.
- 30-day performance review with manager to set goals for the next 60 days.
Month 3: Full Integration & Validation
Goal: Validate full clinical competency and transition to routine performance management.
- Transition to a full patient schedule.
- Complete final clinical competency assessments (e.g., a mock case presentation, a chart-stimulated recall interview).
- Transition from daily preceptor check-ins to weekly 1-on-1s with manager.
- 90-day performance review: officially “graduates” from onboarding. Set performance goals for the rest of the year.
24.3.4 Mentorship & Development: From Competence to Mastery
Effective onboarding gets a new hire to a state of baseline competence. A robust mentorship and development program is what cultivates their long-term growth from competence to mastery. This is the crucial engine of retention. Talented, ambitious pharmacists do not leave jobs; they leave managers and organizations that fail to invest in their professional growth. Your role as a leader is to create a culture of continuous learning and to provide a structured framework for career development.
Training vs. Mentoring vs. Coaching
It’s critical to understand the difference between these three development modalities and to deploy them intentionally.
Training
Focus: Teaching a specific, tangible skill.
Timeframe: Short-term, task-oriented.
Example: “I am going to train you on how to use the EMR’s billing function.”
Mentoring
Focus: Providing long-term career guidance.
Timeframe: Long-term, relationship-oriented.
Example: “Let’s talk about your five-year plan and what projects you can take on to become ready for a leadership role.”
Coaching
Focus: Improving a specific performance issue.
Timeframe: Immediate, situation-oriented.
Example: “In that patient interaction, I noticed you didn’t use the teach-back method. Let’s discuss how we can incorporate that next time.”
Playbook: The “I Do, We Do, You Do” Clinical Training Method
This is a classic, highly effective, and simple model for teaching any new clinical skill during onboarding or precepting. It provides a gradual release of responsibility.
- I Do (Modeling): The preceptor/mentor performs the task while the new hire observes. Example: “Watch me as I conduct this initial anticoagulation consult. Pay attention to how I phrase the questions and explain the monitoring plan.”
- We Do (Guided Practice): The new hire performs the task with the preceptor present, providing real-time guidance and support. Example: “Now you’re going to lead the next consult. I’ll be here with you. If you get stuck, I’ll jump in to help.”
- You Do (Independent Application): The new hire performs the task independently. The preceptor reviews the outcome later and provides feedback. Example: “You’re ready. See the next two patients on your own. I will review your documentation at the end of the day and we can discuss how it went.”
Structuring a Formal Mentorship Program
While informal mentorship is valuable, a structured program ensures that every pharmacist has access to career guidance, not just the most assertive ones. This is a powerful tool for retention and succession planning.
Masterclass Table: Key Components of a Mentorship Program
| Component | Description | Best Practices |
|---|---|---|
| Mentor Matching | Pairing a junior pharmacist (protégé) with a more senior pharmacist (mentor) who is not their direct manager. | Base pairings on career interests, not just convenience. A new pharmacist interested in research should be paired with a pharmacist who has published, for example. Allow protégés to have input on their mentor selection. |
| Goal Setting & Mentorship Agreement | At the first meeting, the pair establishes 2-3 clear, written development goals for the year. This creates focus and accountability for the relationship. | Goals should follow the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) framework. Example: “Complete a draft of a research abstract (S) for submission to the ASHP Midyear meeting (M, A) to build my academic skills (R) by September 1st (T).” |
| Structured Check-ins | A commitment for the mentor and protégé to meet for a dedicated, uninterrupted period on a regular basis (e.g., one hour every month). | These meetings should be scheduled far in advance and protected from cancellation. The protégé, not the mentor, should be responsible for setting the agenda for each meeting to encourage ownership of their own development. |
| Constructive Feedback | The mentor’s primary role is to provide honest, constructive, and forward-looking feedback based on their observations and experience. | Use the Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) model for feedback: “In the team meeting yesterday (Situation), when you presented your data, you spoke very quickly (Behavior), and the impact was that some of the physicians seemed confused (Impact). Let’s talk about some strategies to pace yourself next time.” |
24.3.5 Building the Future: Managing Students and Residents as a Talent Pipeline
An advanced practice site should not view pharmacy students and residents as temporary labor, but as the foundation of its long-term talent strategy. Every rotation is a months-long, immersive job interview. It is your single best opportunity to evaluate a future colleague’s clinical skills, work ethic, and cultural fit in a real-world setting. A well-run student and residency program becomes a self-sustaining pipeline that dramatically reduces your external recruitment costs and hiring risks.
The Strategic Imperative of Excellent Precepting
A poorly organized, uninspiring rotation does more than just fail to teach a student; it actively damages your brand. Students and residents talk to each other. Word spreads quickly about which sites are innovative and engaging, and which are chaotic and unsupportive. A reputation as a “must-do” rotation site gives you your pick of the top students year after year, creating a significant competitive advantage in the hiring market.
The Layered Learning Model
One of the most effective models for integrating learners into a busy practice is the layered learning model. In this structure, the attending pharmacist, resident, and student work as a small team, managing a shared panel of patients with escalating levels of responsibility. This model allows the pharmacist to increase the team’s overall capacity while providing valuable teaching and supervisory experience for the resident.
Attending Pharmacist
Oversees the entire team. Manages the most complex patients directly. Reviews and co-signs all resident and student work. Provides feedback and coaching.
PGY2 Resident
Manages a panel of moderately complex patients. Conducts initial workup on new patients before presenting to the attending. Serves as the primary preceptor for the student.
APPE Student
Manages low-complexity follow-up patients. Gathers patient histories, performs medication reconciliations, and provides basic patient education under the direct supervision of the resident.