CHPPC Module 30, Section 30.1: Pyxis/Omnicell Override Etiquette
MODULE 30: OVERRIDE & BEDSIDE REALITIES

Section 30.1: Pyxis/Omnicell Override Etiquette: When It’s OK, and When It’s Not

Mastering one of the highest-risk decisions in hospital pharmacy: navigating the ethics and safety of bypassing the pharmacist’s review.

SECTION 30.1

Pyxis/Omnicell Override Etiquette

Balancing the need for speed with the mandate for safety.

30.1.1 The “Glass Case”: Understanding the Power and Peril of the Override

In every high-stakes environment, there is an emergency override. It’s the red “break glass in case of emergency” fire alarm box on the wall, the emergency stop button on an assembly line, the manual override for an airplane’s autopilot. These mechanisms exist for a single reason: to bypass standard operating procedures when those procedures are too slow to respond to a life-threatening crisis. The ability for a nurse to override an Automated Dispensing Cabinet (ADC) like a Pyxis or Omnicell is pharmacy’s version of that glass case. It is a powerful, necessary, and exceptionally dangerous tool.

To understand the risk, you must first appreciate the safety net that an override intentionally cuts. The standard medication workflow is a masterpiece of safety engineering, with each step designed to catch potential errors. The physician enters an order, but it is held in a pending state. The pharmacist—a second, highly trained clinician with a different perspective—then performs a meticulous review. They check the dose, the indication, the patient’s allergies, their organ function, and potential drug interactions. Only after this independent double-check is the medication “released” and made available to the nurse in the ADC. The override function takes a sledgehammer to this entire process. It allows a medication to be pulled from the machine and administered to a patient before any pharmacist has ever laid eyes on the order.

The Override as a Safety Inversion

The standard workflow is designed to prevent errors before they reach the patient. The override workflow, by its very nature, allows a potential error to reach the patient’s bedside immediately. The safety process is inverted: instead of prospective prevention, we are left with only retrospective review. This is why the decision to use, or approve the use of, an override is one of the most critical judgments a nurse and pharmacist can make. It is an explicit acceptance of a higher level of risk, and it must be reserved for situations where the risk of delay is unequivocally greater than the risk of an unreviewed order.

Standard Workflow vs. Override Workflow: The Bypassed Safety Checks

Safety Step Standard (Profiled) Workflow Override Workflow
Order Entry Physician enters an order into the EHR. Medication is removed from the ADC *before* a formal order may exist.
Pharmacist Verification Pharmacist performs a full clinical review:
  • Correct drug, dose, route, frequency?
  • Appropriate for the indication?
  • Allergy check?
  • Drug interaction check?
  • Renal/hepatic dose adjustment needed?
ENTIRE STEP IS BYPASSED. None of these safety checks are performed by a pharmacist prior to medication availability.
Medication Availability Medication becomes available for withdrawal from the ADC *only after* pharmacist verification. Medication is available for immediate withdrawal by a nurse selecting the “override” function.
Administration Nurse administers a pharmacist-reviewed medication. Nurse administers a medication that has not been reviewed by a pharmacist.
Pharmacist Review Prospective (before administration). Retrospective (after administration). The pharmacist only reviews the override report later to “clean up” the record, long after the drug has been given.

30.1.2 The Justifiable Override: A Masterclass in True Emergencies

The list of situations that justify an override is exceptionally short. A justifiable override is always linked to a sudden, life-threatening clinical deterioration where a delay of even a few minutes to wait for pharmacist verification could lead to irreversible patient harm or death. These are the “Code Blue” moments of medication administration. As a pharmacist, you must know these scenarios by heart, not to approve them in real-time (as they are happening too fast), but to recognize them as appropriate when you perform your retrospective review.

The Litmus Test for a Justifiable Override

Ask yourself this question: “Is there a reasonable chance the patient will die or suffer severe, irreversible harm in the next 5-10 minutes if this medication is not administered immediately?” If the answer is an unequivocal “yes,” then an override is likely justified. If the answer is “no,” “maybe,” or “it would be inconvenient,” then an override is not appropriate.

Masterclass Table of Justifiable Override Scenarios

This table details the rare clinical emergencies where bypassing the pharmacist is the correct and expected standard of care.

Emergency Scenario Clinical Description & Rationale for Speed Common Medications Pulled on Override Pharmacist’s Retrospective Role
Cardiopulmonary Arrest (“Code Blue”) The patient has no pulse and is not breathing. This is the ultimate medical emergency. Medications from the crash cart or ADC must be given within seconds based on ACLS algorithms. There is zero time for order entry or verification.
  • Epinephrine
  • Amiodarone
  • Lidocaine
  • Sodium Bicarbonate
  • Calcium Chloride
After the code is over, your job is to reconcile the code record with the patient’s chart. You ensure a physician enters retrospective orders for every medication that was administered, linking them to the override transaction.
Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) The patient is in acute respiratory failure and must be emergently intubated to secure their airway. A specific sequence of sedatives and paralytics must be given in rapid succession to facilitate the procedure safely. Delay could lead to hypoxia and brain death.
  • Etomidate or Ketamine (Induction agent)
  • Succinylcholine or Rocuronium (Paralytic agent)
Similar to a code blue, you will retrospectively review the override and ensure a physician has entered the appropriate orders for the RSI medications. You also ensure the paralytic is not continued as a scheduled infusion by mistake.
Status Epilepticus / Active Seizure A patient is having a prolonged seizure (>5 minutes) that is not stopping. Every second of seizure activity increases the risk of permanent neuronal damage. Emergent administration of a benzodiazepine is the first-line treatment.
  • Lorazepam IV
  • Diazepam IV/PR
  • Midazolam IV/IM
Review the override to ensure the dose was appropriate. Ensure a formal order is entered. Assess if the patient needs scheduled antiepileptic therapy to be ordered to prevent recurrence.
Acute, Severe Hypoglycemia with Altered Mental Status A patient’s blood sugar is critically low (e.g., <40 mg/dL) and they are unconscious, confused, or seizing, and unable to take oral glucose. IV dextrose is a life-saving intervention that must be given immediately to prevent brain damage.
  • Dextrose 50% (D50W) IV
  • Glucagon IM (if no IV access)
Review the override. Ensure a physician enters the order. Most importantly, investigate the *cause* of the hypoglycemia. Was an antidiabetic agent dosed incorrectly? Your role shifts to preventing the next episode.
Sudden, Severe Agitation with Danger to Self or Staff A patient develops acute, violent delirium or psychosis and is an immediate physical danger to themselves or the healthcare team. A chemical restraint (an emergent antipsychotic or benzodiazepine) is needed to de-escalate the situation safely.
  • Haloperidol IM
  • Olanzapine IM
  • Lorazepam IM
Review the override to ensure it aligns with hospital policy for chemical restraints. Ensure the order is entered and that the underlying cause of the agitation is being investigated (e.g., delirium, substance withdrawal).

30.1.3 The Unjustifiable Override: A Masterclass in Resisting Convenience

The vast majority of override requests you will encounter in your daily practice are not for the true emergencies listed above. They are driven by a desire for speed, a frustration with perceived delays, or a misunderstanding of the risks involved. These are the moments where your role as a safety gatekeeper is most critical. Your job is to politely, professionally, and firmly say “no” to the override while simultaneously demonstrating your value by rapidly solving the underlying problem that led to the request.

The Art of the “Yes, and…” Response

Never start your response to an inappropriate override request with a flat “No.” This creates an adversarial dynamic. Instead, use a collaborative “Yes, and…” approach.

Nurse: “I need to override the morphine, the patient is in severe pain and I don’t see it on their profile.”

Your Response:Yes, I agree we need to get your patient pain medication immediately, and for their safety, I need to verify the order first before it can be pulled. I see the order in my queue right now and I am verifying it as we speak. It will be available on the patient’s profile in less than 30 seconds.”

This technique validates the nurse’s concern (the “Yes”), reaffirms the safety standard (the “and”), and provides an immediate solution. You have enforced the policy without creating a conflict.

Masterclass Table of Unjustifiable Override Scenarios & The Pharmacist’s Playbook

This table details common but inappropriate override requests and provides a step-by-step guide on how to manage them effectively.

The Scenario & Nurse’s Rationale The Hidden Safety Risks The Pharmacist’s Step-by-Step Playbook
“The order is in, but it’s not showing up. Pharmacy is too slow.”

Rationale: The nurse sees a new order and wants to act on it immediately, but it’s not yet profiled in the ADC. They believe the delay is purely administrative.
  • The order may have a significant, un-assessed clinical issue (wrong dose, interaction, allergy). This is the whole point of verification.
  • The “delay” may be the pharmacist actively investigating one of these very issues.
  • It could be a technical glitch where the order hasn’t properly crossed over to the pharmacy system.
  1. Acknowledge Urgency: “I understand you need that medication now.”
  2. Take Ownership: “Let me check my queue for you. What is the patient’s name?”
  3. Diagnose the Problem:
    • If it’s in your queue: “I have the order right here. I just need to complete my safety check. Give me 30 seconds.” -> Verify it immediately.
    • If it’s NOT in your queue: “I don’t see that order in my system yet, which means there might be a technical issue. Can you ask the provider to re-enter it or call me with a verbal order so I can get it to you safely?”
  4. Provide a Solution (Not an Override): “The order is now verified and should be on the patient’s profile. Please let me know if you still can’t see it.”
“It’s just a routine PRN.”

Rationale: The nurse perceives the medication as low-risk (e.g., acetaminophen, ondansetron) and believes verification is a formality that can be skipped for patient comfort.
  • Dose/Frequency Errors: Is the order for acetaminophen 1000mg q4h? This exceeds the 4g/day max and requires intervention.
  • Indication Mismatch: An order for ondansetron for nausea in a patient on multiple other serotonergic drugs could pose a risk for serotonin syndrome or QTc prolongation.
  • Patient Status Change: The patient may have developed new liver or kidney dysfunction, making the “routine” dose unsafe.
  1. Validate the Goal, Reaffirm the Process: “I agree, we should get the patient some Tylenol for their fever. For every medication, I’m required to do a quick safety check first.”
  2. Perform a Rapid Review: Pull up the order. Quickly check the dose, frequency, and patient parameters. “Okay, I see the order for 650mg, that’s perfect. I’m verifying it now.”
  3. Educate Gently (If time permits): “The reason we review even routine meds is to do things like calculate the total daily dose to make sure we stay under the safety limit.”
“The doctor is standing right here and told me to get it.”

Rationale: The nurse is under direct pressure from a physician and feels caught in the middle. They are using the physician’s presence as justification for the override.
  • This bypasses CPOE (Computerized Physician Order Entry), one of the greatest safety tools in modern medicine.
  • It encourages unsafe verbal orders and increases the risk of transcription errors.
  • It puts the nurse and pharmacist in a position of accepting liability for an order that is not formally documented.
  1. Be the Ally, Not the Obstacle: “I completely understand. To make sure we are all on the same page and the patient is safe, can you either ask the doctor to place the order in the computer so I can verify it, or can you put them on the phone with me to give me a formal verbal order?”
  2. Offer the “Verbal Order” Path of Least Resistance: “The fastest way to do this safely is for me to take a verbal order from the doctor directly. I can have it active for you in less than a minute. Is he or she available to speak with me?”
  3. Document Everything: If you take a verbal order, document it meticulously, including read-back and verification.
“It’s just a saline flush / sterile water.”

Rationale: The nurse views these as supplies, not medications, and doesn’t understand why a pharmacist’s review is needed. Accessing them from the override menu is seen as a simple workflow shortcut.
  • Wrong Item Pulled: In the override menu, a nurse might accidentally select a high-risk electrolyte (like KCl) or another look-alike/sound-alike medication instead of saline.
  • Inappropriate Use: Using sterile water for injection as a flush can cause hemolysis. Using a bacteriostatic saline flush for a neonate can cause toxicity. The pharmacist’s review ensures the correct product is profiled for the correct purpose.
  • Inventory & Billing Integrity: Overriding these items creates a documentation black hole, making it impossible to track usage and bill appropriately.
  1. Diagnose the Root Cause: “I understand you just need a flush. Can you tell me why you’re not able to pull it from the patient’s profile? Is there no order for flushes?”
  2. Provide the Systemic Fix: “It sounds like we need to get a standard flush order on the patient’s profile. I can enter a protocol order for that right now, and then you’ll be able to pull them easily without needing to override.”
  3. Educate on the Risk: “The reason we profile even simple things like flushes is to prevent accidental selection of a dangerous medication from the override list. Profiling it for you makes it safer.”

30.1.4 Retail Pharmacist Analogy: The “Doctor Said It Was Okay” Refill

A Deep Dive into the Analogy

You have navigated the high-stakes pressure of an inappropriate override request thousands of times in your retail career. The scenario is different, but the core conflict—balancing patient demand against your professional duty to follow safety procedures—is identical.

The Scenario:

A patient comes to your counter on a Friday evening. They are out of their oxycodone and have no refills remaining. The patient is anxious, insistent, and tells you, “I just saw the doctor this morning, and he said he would send in a new prescription. He said it was okay for me to get it.” You check your system, and there is no new electronic prescription. There is no voicemail from the doctor. The patient insists, “But he told me I could get it! I need it now!”

Deconstructing the Conflict:

  • The Patient’s Need (The Nurse’s Request): The patient has a legitimate need for their medication. Their desire is real and immediate.
  • The Bypassed Procedure (The Override): The patient is asking you to bypass the fundamental, legally required procedure: you must have a valid, new prescription in hand before you can dispense a Schedule II medication. Their verbal claim that “the doctor said it was okay” is the equivalent of a nurse asking for an override based on a verbal conversation.
  • Your Role as Gatekeeper (The Pharmacist’s Duty): You know you cannot dispense the medication. It would be a violation of the law and a massive patient safety risk. What if the doctor changed the dose? What if they decided to stop the medication entirely? You are the final checkpoint.

Your “Yes, and…” Playbook in Action:

You don’t just say “No” and stare at the patient. You use the exact same collaborative problem-solving technique:

Yes, I absolutely want to help you get the pain medication you need, and for me to be able to legally and safely dispense it, I need to have the actual prescription from your doctor. Let me call his after-hours service right now and see if we can get him to send it electronically or call in a verbal prescription to get you through the weekend.”

You have validated the patient’s need while firmly upholding the safety standard. You have taken ownership of solving the problem. This is the exact same skill set, mindset, and “etiquette” required to manage ADC overrides in the hospital. You are already an expert at this.